www.cyberrefugee.com

was registered as a domain in October 2011 to host and mirror the following domains

www.leeanneart.com
www.vakras.com

Ever since we held an exhibition in Guildford Lane Gallery of Melbourne in 2009, the owner of that gallery, Robert Cripps, has caused us many problems.

Our websites have been disabled by successive ISPs in Australia.

The latest problem was that on the instructions of the solicitors acting for Robert Cripps, Australia's primary telco, Telstra, disconnected us from the internet. Worse still, using the cover of this disconnection, our domains were hijacked. This is still under police investigation.

To read more:
- http://leeanneart.blogspot.com/2011/10/australian-defamation-law-vs-muscular.html
- http://www.cyberrefugee.com/telstra-problems-vakras.html
- http://leeanneart.blogspot.com/2011/11/freedom-to-receive-and-impart.html
- ther reading http://leeanneart.blogspot.com/2011/11/humanist-transhumanist-is-it-racist-to.html
- on the conspiracy to commit fraud http://www.cyberrefugee.com/conspiracy-to-commit-fraud.html
- Redleg V Artists site

Australia is a nation in which the citizen has none of the rights guaranteed to the citizens of other nations. There are no constitutional safeguards for Australian citizens. Indeed, Australia has no constitution to speak of, other than an English Act of Parliament signed into law by Queen Victoria of England in 1900.

This English Act of Parliament was supposed to have been modelled on the constitution of the USA. And a poor immitation of that it is.

The actions successfully taken against us are all a consequence of grave deficiencies in Australian (English) law;

with laws that do not acknowledge any right of the citizen to freely receive or impart information (even though Australia as a signatory to UN resolutions should provide these rights, Australia does not recognise them);
with laws that enforce the prohibition to freely impart or receive information by means of "prior restraint" whereby, any unsubstantiated accusation is sufficient of itself to prevent the imparting of information ("... U.S. law strongly discourages efforts to censor Web sites before a full trial can be held. That's called 'prior restraint'" );
in which the enforcement of "prior restraint" is itself augmented by laws that demand that anyone who might have imparted information has to demonstrate why they have felt obliged to impart (truthful) information that might assist another as if imparting (truthful) information beneficial to others is contrary to human, or even general biological, nature. Even rats act to assist one-another, ( LINK ) but in Australia, the legal system which has no place for ethical standards, believes that actions undertaken that might assist others are so irrational that they require some explanation … (which translates thus: those in the legal profession, solicitors, barristers, magistrates, judges, are not partaking their roles out of a sense of duty toward others, but for their own self-serving ends; thus the law is not about ethics, it is about itself, is self-serving, self-congratulatory, and solely about the ego of its practitioners); Australia is a bully nation and has the laws to prove this (eg Terra Nullius) by force-of-law.